Exams body given 7 days to explain results grading
Education, Science, Technology and
Vocational Training Minister, Professor Joyce Ndalichako, issued the
directive in Dar es Salaam when she visited the NECTA offices for a
familiarisation tour.
She gave the ultimatum as she was not
convinced by the response given by the council’s Executive Secretary, Dr
Charles Msonde, on the change in the grading system for Form Four and
Form Six results, effective 2014 when the results were graded in GPAs
instead of in divisions.
Prof Ndalichako, who had served as NECTA
Executive Secretary for nine years, said she has been receiving
numerous complaints on the grading system since becoming minister,
“hence the need for professional answers on what prompted the move’’.
She also directed NECTA to, within the
same period, state the professional and logical reasons that made them
give private candidates in secondary schools paper two examination which
serves as a continuous assessment. “I have not been satisfied with the
reasons given as far as the decision was made.
Did you satisfy yourselves that it was
purely for academic benefit and took into account views of the
stakeholders before making the changes?” she questioned.
Dr Msonde had stated that they changed
the grading after they had agreed with the Tanzania Commission for
University (TCU), NACTE, the then Ministry of Education and Vocational
Training in accordance with the need of e-government to centralise the
grading system.
“The changes aimed at easing the higher
learning education registration system, employment and e-government,
hence the need to change the grading in GPA system by the institutions.
Through this system, one does not need
to attach the certificate while it has also been easy to identify fake
certificates” explained Dr Msonde. On continuous assessments-cumexams,
Dr Msonde said most of the private candidates complained that they were
failing since there was no way they could trace their performance thus a
need for a paper two exams that served as their assessment.
Prof Ndalichako queried: “How do you
give continuous assessment exam for a student while not aware of his or
her learning environment? “I have not been satisfied with the reasons
given as far as the decision is concerned. Do you see any logic in
having two papers and the cost attached to it? If possible, they should
not sit for that exam this year”.
She further told NECTA officials that as
a think-tank, they should be very reasonable and start being guided by
professionalism when making decisions that have an impact on the
education quality and standard. “So far, the reasons given do not have
any logical grounds.
I give you seven days to write
professionally as the national think-tank in the education sector the
reasons that made you go for those two decisions and the effects they
have in improving the sector”, the minister directed.
Prof Ndalichako said she was not against
changes, arguing that any changes must be accompanied by adverse and
genuine reasons, “or otherwise there is no need to rush into things that
have no impact and have not taken into account views of the
stakeholders’’.
The minister revealed that she wanted to
set system that will work out without depending on one person to
maintain sustainability and consistency. She insisted on the need for
accountability, urging NECTA to make an effort to seal examination
leakages for the good image of the institution.
Prof Ndalichako called upon NECTA
officials to provide indicators they believe should be worked upon to
effect improvements as they were better positioned to identify areas of
student’s weaknesses when marking exam papers.READ MORE
Comments
Post a Comment